public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: FD Cami <francois.cami@free.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extX: convert prink(KERN_WARNING) to extX_warning()
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080623203107.GD6239@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080622201841.669ff882@olorin>

On Jun 22, 2008  20:18 +0200, FD Cami wrote:
> This patch takes a shot at replacing the direct use of printk(KERN_WARNING)
> in extX by extX_warning. We now get the device number in the warning message :
> "EXT3-fs warning (device hda1): ext3_setup_super: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended"
> It also adds the device information on a pair of printk(KERN_ERR) (this was
> first suggested by Kasper two weeks ago).

The one issue is that KERN_ERR != KERN_WARNING, so these errors might
not be visible on the console, or may not be saved to the syslog.  The
other minor difference is that the function name is also printed, and this
makes the error message very long.

One suggestion is to create a separate macro that passes the KERN_*
flag and __func__ to ext3_console_msg(), and call that from
ext3_warning() and a new ext3_start_error() function.  I always found
it annoying to have to specify __func__ as a parameter for every call.

>  	ext3_warning(sb, __func__,
> -		     "updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, "
> -		     "running e2fsck is recommended",
> -		     EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV);
> +			"updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, "
> +			"running e2fsck is recommended",
> +			EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV);

Please don't change all of the indenting.  The old indending is proper
linux coding style (aligned with previous '('), the new one is not.

Note that you need to split up the patches for ext2, ext3, ext4 into
separate emails.  I'd suggest just sending one of them until we agree
on what is right, then submitting the rest afterward.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-23 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-22 18:18 [PATCH] extX: convert prink(KERN_WARNING) to extX_warning() FD Cami
2008-06-23 20:31 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2008-06-23 20:34   ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-23 20:38   ` Randy Dunlap
2008-06-24  6:47     ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-23 22:20   ` FD Cami
2008-06-24  6:53     ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080623203107.GD6239@webber.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=francois.cami@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox