Re: Performance of ext4

Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-27T09:50:53Z

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 02:44:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:46:39PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 09:09 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Mingming wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 21:12 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> > > >> Yes, with this patch applied on top of latest patch queue I no longer
> > > >> get truncated files, after running a short test. Tomorrow I will do some
> > > >> more thorough testing and use the patch you have send to me in a separate
> > > >> mail. The above patch did not apply but it was easy to apply by hand.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for quick response and test. I have updated the patch queue with
> > > > above patch merged. Please let me know if you still see apply issue and
> > > > file size update issue with current patch queue.
> > > >
> > > Thanks, it applies without any problems. However I still hit an oops. What
> > > I find strange is that I got the oops just as the benchmark is done and
> > > all process where shutting down. The same behaviour I reported here:
> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0806.2/2113.html
> > > Only this time I got just one oops. This is on x86_64 system (4 Opteron CPU's
> > > and SW Raid 1+0). I have not seen this on my home system x86 (1 Dual Core
> > > and HW Raid). Anyway, here the dmesg output:
> > >
> > > kjournald2 starting. Commit interval 15 seconds
> > > EXT4 FS on md7, internal journal
> > > EXT4-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > > EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
> > > EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
> > > JBD: barrier-based sync failed on md7 - disabling barriers
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1667!
> >
> > Did not get a chance to look more closely today, but it's point to this
> > code in ext4_da_writepage()
> >
> > page_bufs = page_buffers(page);
> >
> > and appearently it's BUG_ON at
> > BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); in page_buffers().
> >
> >
>
> Ok so we are doing the journal_commit and meanwhile shrink_page_list
> dropped the buffer. I guess what is happening is
>
>
> journal_submit_inode_data_buffers
> generic_writepages
> write_cache_pages
> pagevec_lookup_tag(..PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,..)
> foreach(page)
> shrink_page_list
> lock_page
> ext4_releasepage
> try_to_free_buffers
> drop_buffers
> cancel_dirty_page
> unlock_page
> lock_page()
> BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page));
>
>
> How about the below ?

or update write_cache_pages not to call writepage if the page is not
dirty ?

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ded57d5..0a13702 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -929,6 +929,11 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
continue;
}

+ if (!PageDirty(page)) {
+ unlock_page(page);
+ continue;
+ }
+
ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);

if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE)) {