From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:30:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080624113049.GA7731@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806240410.47856.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> so could use mem below max_low_pfn as early. could move several
> function more early instead of waiting after paging_init including
> moving relocate_initrd early, and kva related early done in
> initmem_init
applied to tip/x86/setup-memory - thanks Yinghai.
a sidenote:
> 6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
this patch is too large - if it causes any problems it will not be very
easy to figure out which exact change caused the problems.
Lets hope it goes all fine - but in the future lets try doing
more+smaller patches, especially if they change some known-dangerous
area of the kernel.
For example here a better splitup would have been to do 5 or more
patches:
1) first introduce init_memory_mapping() [but dont use it anywhere]
2) add the init_memory_mapping() call to setup_arch()
3) move remap_numa_kva()
4) move relocate_initrd()
5) remove the now unnecessary setup from paging_init()
... or something like that. The point is to manage risk: if there's
multiple problem areas that a change is touching, try to isolate them
from each other and introduce the change gradually.
The end result is still exactly the same, but much more
reviewable/debuggable/bisectable.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 2:51 [PATCH] x86: move some func calling from setup_arch to paging_init Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 2:52 ` [PATCH] x86: setup_arch 64bit move efi_init calling early Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 2:52 ` [PATCH] x86: setup_arch 64bit move kvmclock_init later Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 2:53 ` [PATCH] x86: setup_arch 32bit move efi check later Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 2:54 ` [PATCH] x86: setup_arch 32bit move command line copying early Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 2:55 ` [PATCH] x86: setup_arch 32bit move kvm_guest_init later Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 11:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 11:10 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-24 17:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 22:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 19:18 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit #1 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 19:18 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit #2 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-24 19:19 ` [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit #3 Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080624113049.GA7731@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox