Re: [3/10 PATCH] inline wake_up_bit

David Miller
2008-06-25T22:30:21Z

From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:17:40 +0200

> And you know what? This is likely not the end yet! It's possible
> spin_lock_irqXXX, __wake_up_common, waitqueue_active or bit_waitqueue
> are inlines - I didn't check.

The thing to do in these kinds of scenerios is to provide top-level
routes in kernel/sched.c where all the inlining occurs, rather
than doing it in header files and thus expanding this stuff in
multiple places.