public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add /sys/firmware/memmap
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:43:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080625224301.GE32344@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214423826-12628-2-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:57:05PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> This patch adds /sys/firmware/memmap interface that represents the BIOS
> (or Firmware) provided memory map. The tree looks like:
> 
>     /sys/firmware/memmap/0/start   (hex number)
>                            end     (hex number)
>                            type    (string)
>     ...                 /1/start
>                            end
>                            type
> 
> With the following shell snippet one can print the memory map in the same form
> the kernel prints itself when booting on x86 (the E820 map).
> 
>   --------- 8< --------------------------
>     #!/bin/sh
>     cd /sys/firmware/memmap
>     for dir in * ; do
>         start=$(cat $dir/start)
>         end=$(cat $dir/end)
>         type=$(cat $dir/type)
>         printf "%016x-%016x (%s)\n" $start $[ $end +1] "$type"
>     done
>   --------- >8 --------------------------
> 
> That patch only provides the needed interface:
> 
>  1. The sysfs interface.
>  2. The structure and enumeration definition.
>  3. The function firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
>     that should be called from architecture code (E820/EFI, for
>     example) to add the contents to the interface.
> 
> If the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP, the interface does
> nothing without cluttering the architecture-specific code with #ifdef's.
> 

Hi Bernhard,

Thanks for the patch. Couple of thoughts.

Do we really need another CONFIG option (CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP)? To,
me this does not seem to be a big chunk of code at the same time I am
assuming that most of the people will use it (because of kexec). So
probably, it might not make lot of sense to put additional CONFIG option.

[..]
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware-map.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * String representation of enum firmware_map_type from
> + * <linux/firmware-map.h>.
> + */
> +const char *type_to_string_map[] = {
> +	"RAM",				/* MAP_RAM */
> +	"Reserved",			/* MAP_RESERVED */
> +	"ACPI Tables",			/* MAP_ACPI */
> +	"Non-volatile Storage",		/* MAP_NVS */
> +};
> +

How about leaving the decision of memory type on arch dependent code? How
about letting arch code pass you an string while adding entry and that
string will contain the type of memory. The way request_resource() is
implemented. 

I think that would be easier and provide more flexibility to arch
dependent code. For example, I see so many additional memory types for
EFI code. It will be good to give EFI code flexibility that how does
he perceive a particular memory region and then let kexec-tools deal 
with various memory types.
 
Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-25 19:57 x86: Add /sys/firmware/memmap Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 22:43   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-06-26  8:13     ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26  8:45       ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26  9:11         ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26 18:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 18:18             ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 19:18               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 18:23             ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 12:42       ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26  8:15     ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 19:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use FIRMWARE_MEMMAP on x86/E820 Bernhard Walle
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-26  8:14 x86: Add /sys/firmware/memmap Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26  8:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:19 x86: " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:45   ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 22:24   ` Greg KH
2008-06-27 11:08     ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 x86: " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 18:51   ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-27 20:56   ` Greg KH
2008-07-01 20:30     ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-01 20:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-12  0:36   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080625224301.GE32344@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox