From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755521AbYFZA1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:27:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751999AbYFZA1E (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:27:04 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:55196 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbYFZA1B (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:27:01 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Stephen Rothwell , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 25 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:28:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton References: <20080626003554.b2623aba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080626003554.b2623aba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806260228.38674.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 25 of June 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > Changes since next-20080624: > > The tip-core tree gained three conflicts against Linus' tree. > > The sched tree gained a conflict against the cpus4096 tree. > > The x86 tree gained a conflict against the ftrace tree. It also required > three patches that Ingo supplied. > > The pci tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree. > > The v4l-dvb tree has had another commit reverted for a build problem, > however that may have been due to a mismerge in yesterday's tree. > > The acpi tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree. > > The tests tree gained a conflict against the sched tree. > > The vfs tree gained a conflict against the sched tree. > > The rr tree gained a conflict against each of the sched and powerpc > trees. It also required a patch and a commit reverted for build problems. > > The pcmcia tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree. This tree is completely broken on my test box (x86-64 HP nx6325) and I can't even bisect it. :-( It hits a NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol during boot, but when I tried to bisect this issue, I hit another one that made the box hang solid during boot (early, no messages available). If things continue going this way, 2.6.27 will be a disaster ... Thanks, Rafael