Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote:
> > > > > Okay, so how about this then ?
> > > >
> > > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks,
> > >
> > > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that
> > > really does what everybody wants is this one instead:
> >
> > applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse.
> 
> Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it?  Is it intended 
> for my linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get 
> upstream now?  Which branch should I diff/log against to see the 
> changes (last time I looked it appeared neither master nor tip were 
> the correct ones...)

that branch is always based in -git so if stuff goes upstream patches 
disappear from it. git-log linus/master..tip/pci-for-jesse should tell 
the currently pending items. Right now it's just two lowprio items:

 Yinghai Lu (2):
      pci: debug extra pci resources range
      pci: debug extra pci bus resources

	Ingo