From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oops when using growisofs
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:36:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626183610.GI20851@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806262021.32140.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Thu, Jun 26 2008, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008 20:11:42 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26 2008, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 25-06-08 11:46:29, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 June 2008 11:37:00 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > > Yeah the IO error is the trigger.
> > > > > > I noticed that it had obvious troubles accessing the DVD that was in the drive.
> > > > > > It sweeped over it for several seconds, then hung the system for 2 or 3 seconds
> > > > > > and then oopsed. But after that everything continued to work as usual.
> > > > > > (Except kded of course)
> > > > > Hmm, by "accessing" do you mean that you've mounted the burned DVD and when
> > > > > browsing it the IO error and the oops occured or that IO error happened
> > > > > when burning? It is important because in the first case i_blkbits would be
> > > > > taken from some ISOFS inode desribing some file while in the second case
> > > > > i_blkbits are from the inode of the device...
> > > > I don't know. kded, which caused the oops, is always running. It is a KDE daemon
> > > > that polls device state and so on. So yeah, it might have accessed the drive
> > > > while growisofs was writing to it.
> > > >
> > > > However with "accessing" I mean the DVD drive motor was spinning up and down
> > > > and the laser lens was moving like crazy. The sound that happens, if you put
> > > > a completely scratched DVD into the drive and it is unable to make sense of it.
> > > > However, this was not scratched. It was a new DVD with one session on it that
> > > > I just burnt 5 minutes before that. So I wanted to append another session to it
> > > > and it crashed and resulted in IO errors in growisofs.
> > > I've been looking into this problem for some time. The only way how
> > > I see blocksize can be set so big is in cdrom_read_capacity() in
> > > drivers/ide/ide-cd.c. That basically blindly fills in
> > > queue->hardsect_size with what the drive returns and this can
> > > propagate in bd_set_size() to i_blkbits. Jens, do you think that is
> > > possible? Shouldn't ide_cd_read_toc() do some sanity checks of the
> > > blocksize returned?
> >
> > It can't hurt, the value should be >= 512b and <= 4kb. Normally it would
> > be 2kb, but some devices have a 512b switch so that is also seen. Not
> > sure that 1kb and 4kb are valid, but at least it would still point to
> > the drive possibly returning valid data and not garbage. So accept all
> > those, reject (and complain) if it isn't one of those and default to 2kb.
>
> I agree with the need for a hardware sanity check and I would happily test
> any RFC patch :)
Something like this, totally untested...
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
index 68e7f19..5c1e663 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
@@ -1308,13 +1308,29 @@ static int cdrom_read_capacity(ide_drive_t *drive, unsigned long *capacity,
req.cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
stat = ide_cd_queue_pc(drive, &req);
- if (stat == 0) {
- *capacity = 1 + be32_to_cpu(capbuf.lba);
- *sectors_per_frame =
- be32_to_cpu(capbuf.blocklen) >> SECTOR_BITS;
+ if (stat)
+ return stat;
+
+ /*
+ * Sanity check the given block size
+ */
+ switch (capbuf.blocklen) {
+ case 512:
+ case 1024:
+ case 2048:
+ case 4096:
+ break;
+ default:
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ide-cd: weird block size %u\n",
+ capbuf.blocklen);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ide-cd: default to 2kb block size\n");
+ capbuf.blocklen = 2048;
+ break;
}
- return stat;
+ *capacity = 1 + be32_to_cpu(capbuf.lba);
+ *sectors_per_frame = be32_to_cpu(capbuf.blocklen) >> SECTOR_BITS;
+ return 0;
}
static int cdrom_read_tocentry(ide_drive_t *drive, int trackno, int msf_flag,
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-22 16:18 Oops when using growisofs Michael Buesch
2008-06-22 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-22 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-22 22:09 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-22 22:05 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-22 22:28 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-23 6:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-23 6:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 17:28 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-24 18:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-25 1:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-25 9:37 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-25 9:46 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 17:05 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-26 18:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-26 18:21 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 18:36 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-06-26 18:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-26 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-29 19:39 ` Michael Buesch
2008-07-09 18:46 ` Jan Kara
2008-07-22 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080626183610.GI20851@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox