Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements

Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-26T13:12:42Z

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Ok, so that involves exactly what? A new header file, a new API name
> (ideas anyone?) and kerneldoc comments?

Yes, probably just a new header with properly documented functions.
Thew two non-trivial ones you added should probably not be inlines,
btw.

flush_lock_init/flush_lock/flush_trylock/flush_done/flush_is_locked?