From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix rcu vs hotplug race
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:16:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080701061600.GF14658@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080701053900.GB8205@in.ibm.com>
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> So, it's the design of stop_machine() that's preventing someone from
> updating the cpu_online_map while force_quiescent_state() is
> performing the cpu_is_online() check. Becase we always call
> force_quiescent_state() with irqs disabled :)
Paul, do you concur? I'll apply the commit in the form below to
tip/core/urgent if Paul agrees.
Ingo
----------------------------------->
Subject: cpu-hotplug + rcu: fix spurious warning
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:07:00 +0530
On running kernel compiles in parallel with cpu hotplug,
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:118
native_smp_send_reschedule+0x21/0x36()
Modules linked in:
Pid: 27483, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #1
[<c01217d9>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x5d
[<c01515b7>] ? generic_file_aio_read+0x10f/0x137
[<c0151340>] ? file_read_actor+0x0/0xf7
[<c013ae4c>] ? validate_chain+0xaa/0x29c
[<c013c854>] ? __lock_acquire+0x612/0x666
[<c013c854>] ? __lock_acquire+0x612/0x666
[<c013ae4c>] ? validate_chain+0xaa/0x29c
[<c01715d3>] ? file_kill+0x2d/0x30
[<c013cbd7>] ? __lock_release+0x4b/0x51
[<c01715d3>] ? file_kill+0x2d/0x30
[<c0110355>] native_smp_send_reschedule+0x21/0x36
[<c014fe8f>] force_quiescent_state+0x47/0x57
[<c014fef0>] call_rcu+0x51/0x6d
[<c01713b3>] __fput+0x130/0x158
[<c0171231>] fput+0x17/0x19
[<c016fd99>] filp_close+0x4d/0x57
[<c016fdff>] sys_close+0x5c/0x97
[<c0103861>] sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0xb1
=======================
---[ end trace aa35f3913ddf2d06 ]---
This is because a reschedule is sent to a CPU which is offline.
Just ensure that the CPU we send the smp_send_reschedule is actually
online.
It's the design of stop_machine() that's preventing someone from
updating the cpu_online_map while force_quiescent_state() is
performing the cpu_is_online() check. Becase we always call
force_quiescent_state() with irqs disabled :)
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcuclassic.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: tip/kernel/rcuclassic.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/rcuclassic.c
+++ tip/kernel/rcuclassic.c
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct
cpumask = rcp->cpumask;
cpu_clear(rdp->cpu, cpumask);
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpumask)
- smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
}
}
#else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 10:37 [PATCH] fix rcu vs hotplug race Dhaval Giani
2008-06-23 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-23 11:49 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-06-24 11:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-26 15:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-06-27 4:47 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-06-27 5:18 ` Dipankar Sarma
2008-06-27 5:49 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-06-27 14:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-07-01 5:39 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-07-01 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-01 6:28 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-07-01 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 19:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-01 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080701061600.GF14658@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox