From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757470AbYGAIfk (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:35:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758300AbYGAIfE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:35:04 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53475 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756432AbYGAIfC (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:35:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:34:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Huang, Ying" , "H. Peter Anvin" , andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN Message-ID: <20080701083446.GA4281@elte.hu> References: <86802c440806300034x5bb9b7a1s168bbeaee17e5124@mail.gmail.com> <1214812303.3187.10.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <86802c440806300215w31abbcb3h6a42395e11701713@mail.gmail.com> <1214818706.23677.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <86802c440806301205y35563326rd2ada495a0024441@mail.gmail.com> <20080630191628.GA15366@elte.hu> <86802c440806301553y240b020bh9dc448e8085fe60d@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440806301620hafa3ee3k8c5dbe6c45188d69@mail.gmail.com> <1214874582.27760.0.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <86802c440806301821j4d9b100cte6a3e0aee5e3867b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440806301821j4d9b100cte6a3e0aee5e3867b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> Ying, > >> please check the attached patch > > > > Which git-x86 head should I use to test the patch? It can not be applied > > to x86/master. > > tip/master hm, tip/master should be exactly the same thing as x86/master. (the x86.git repository is a symlink to tip.git on kernel.org) Ingo