public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	TAKADA Yoshihito <takada@mbf.nifty.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] x86 ptrace: fix PTRACE_GETFPXREGS error
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:02:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080701150222.GA31456@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080701144658.GA18522@elte.hu>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:46:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > since the original fix is already upstream, i've applied the delta 
> > > > > patch below. Should we still do this for v2.6.26 or can we defer it 
> > > > > to v2.6.27? As ptrace is the only user of this facility for now this 
> > > > > would be an identity transformation AFAICS and the v2.6.26 release 
> > > > > is very close.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think there's a problem with 2.6.26 either way.  I agree that 
> > > > the user_regset internal API does not matter much before 2.6.27.
> > > 
> > > okay - i've queued it up in tip/x86/ptrace for now.
> > > 
> > > > My patch alone applies to 2.6.25, which is why I CC'd it to stable. I 
> > > > think applying that (and not takada's patch) to stable-2.6.25 would be 
> > > > best.
> > > 
> > > i think Greg already queued the original fix up for v2.6.25, as per the 
> > > commit notifier below.
> > 
> > Yes I did queue that one up, but it looks different from Roland's 
> > original patch in this thread.
> 
> yes, but as discussed in this thread, both patches are fine in principle 
> as far as the regression goes.

Ah, great, sorry I missed that.  I'll leave the current patch in our
tree and go get more coffee :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-01 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-30  4:44 [PATCH] ptrace GET/SET FPXREGS broken TAKADA Yoshihito
2008-06-30 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 21:02 ` [PATCH] x86 ptrace: fix PTRACE_GETFPXREGS error Roland McGrath
2008-07-01  9:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01  9:32     ` Roland McGrath
2008-07-01 10:11       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 14:34         ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-07-01 14:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 15:02             ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-07-03  2:37     ` TAKADA Yoshihito
2008-07-03  1:58   ` TAKADA Yoshihito
2008-07-03  3:00     ` Roland McGrath
2008-06-30 21:02 ` [PATCH] ptrace GET/SET FPXREGS broken Roland McGrath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080701150222.GA31456@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=takada@mbf.nifty.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox