public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] workqueues: implement flush_work()
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:03:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080701210300.GA3272@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080701125018.GA99@tv-sign.ru>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:50:18PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
...
> Yes, cwq can be "stale", but this doesn't matter and we can't have
> the false positive here.
> 
> cwq->current_work is always changed under cwq->lock, and we hold this
> lock. If we see "cwq->current_work == work" we can safely insert the
> barrier and wait. Even if this work was already re-queued on another
> CPU or another workqueue_struct.
> 
> Note also that rmb() can't really help here.

Right! The question is how "stale" this cwq could be when read without
any lock or barrier. Of course, there can't be the false positive, but
I wonder if we really do enough, to check if a work isn't current on
some other cwq, even without any immediate re-queuing.

Thanks for the explanation,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-01 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-29 14:49 [PATCH 2/3] workqueues: implement flush_work() Oleg Nesterov
2008-06-30 13:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-07-01 12:50   ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-07-01 21:03     ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-07-02 16:33       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080701210300.GA3272@ami.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox