Re: mmap'ed memory in core files ?

[Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:24:59PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>>>> Have a look at the section "Controlling which mappings are written to
>>>>> the core dump" in a recent core.5 man page:
>>>>> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man5/core.5.html
>>>> thanks for the info.  I didn't know about /proc/PID/coredump_filter.
>>>>
>>>> that part was promising :
>>>>
>>>>       bit 2  Dump file-backed private mappings.
>>>>       bit 3  Dump file-backed shared mappings.
>>>>
>>>>    The default value of coredump_filter is 0x3; this reflects 
>>>> traditional
>>>>    Linux behavior and means that only anonymous memory segments are 
>>>> dumped.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the part that applies to me (I have tested it) is the 
>>>> next one :
>>>>
>>>>    Memory-mapped I/O pages such as frame buffer are never dumped, [...],
>>>>    regardless of the coredump_filter value.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem to you as far as I understand.  I suppose 
> "memory mapped I/O pages" means registers of PCI devices, mapped into the 
> memory address space.
>
> The DMA buffer which you would like to get included in the core file is 
> normal RAM (I suppose: allocated by the kernel in the kernel's virtual 
> address space, mapped into the application client's address space by 
> mmap(), and also mapped into the FireWire controller's local bus address 
> space for it to write received data into).

I agree with your analysis, but the sentence takes as exemple 'frame buffer'
which I don't think are registers. I have tested with a video1394 client,
and I do not get the mmapped video memory in the core file, even with
/proc/PID/coredump_filter set to 0xf.  So, while I agree it seems technically
feasible, it does not seem to be currently implemented :(

Philippe