From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org,
Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vfs: fix lookup on deleted directory
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:42:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080702194249.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1KE81v-0000d8-Kp@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Lookup can install a child dentry for a deleted directory. This keeps
> the directory dentry alive, and the inode pinned in the cache and on
> disk, even after all external references have gone away.
>
> This isn't a big problem normally, since memory pressure or umount
> will clear out the directory dentry and its children, releasing the
> inode. But for UBIFS this causes problems because its orphan area can
> overflow.
>
> Fix this by returning ENOENT for all lookups on a S_DEAD directory
> before creating a child dentry.
I wonder if it would be better to do that in a slightly different way:
if ->lookup() returns negative dentry, check if parent is dead and drop
the sucker if it is. OTOH, "no ->lookup() will be ever called for
dead ones" seems to be a nice property and we are on sufficiently slow
path to not worry about the cost of check-and-branch-not-taken, so I'll
probably drop my variant and pick yours instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-02 19:30 [patch] vfs: fix lookup on deleted directory Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-02 19:42 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-07-03 14:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080702194249.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox