From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
vda.linux@googlemail.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com, ralf@linux-mips.org,
kernel@wantstofly.org, jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulus@samba.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tim.bird@am.sony.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections: v850
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 00:17:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807030017.53747.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486BFC21.1040001@firstfloor.org>
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Same seems to be true for cris btw.
Cris has seen significant updates in 2.6.25 by its maintainer.
It's not a very active port, but skipping updates for one kernel
version is on a completely different scale from doing nothing
at all for over three years as in the v850 case.
I don't currently see any architecture (other than v850) in a
state that justifies removing it entirely.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-02 0:42 [PATCH 21/23] make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections: v850 Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-02 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-02 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-02 22:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-02 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2008-07-03 5:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 9:54 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807030017.53747.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox