From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756170AbYGDW13 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:27:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752959AbYGDW1U (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:27:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57342 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752876AbYGDW1T (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:27:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:20:16 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Alan Stern Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: usb-storage: quirk around v1.11 firmware on Nikon D4 Message-ID: <20080704222015.GA9792@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Alan Stern , Linux Kernel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de References: <20080704195940.GA17510@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 06:09:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Dave Jones wrote: > > > usb-storage: quirk around v1.11 firmware on Nikon D40 > ... > > -UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x04b0, 0x0411, 0x0100, 0x0110, > > +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x04b0, 0x0411, 0x0100, 0x0111, > > "NIKON", > > "NIKON DSC D80", > > You updated the entry for the D80, not the D40. argh. > Maybe they both need to be updated? Maybe. I'm not familiar with how similar the firmware is between those two cameras. The version numbering would certainly suggest that is the case, but should we take a chance and guess, or wait until a user complains? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk