From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the printk problem
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:20:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807051220.25418.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080704150100.1f7b8a65.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Saturday 05 July 2008 00:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > We also jump through hoops to print things like sector_t and
> > > resource_size_t. They always need to be cast to `unsiged long long',
> > > which generates additional stack space and text in some setups.
> >
> > The thing is that GCC checks types. So it's fine to add "print this
> > pointer specially", but you can't in general add new printf arguments
> > without also hacking GCC. Unless you use -Wno-format, and require
> > sparse to check special kernel types.
>
> It would be excellent if gcc had an extension system so that you could
> add new printf control chars and maybe even tell gcc how to check them.
> But of course, if that were to happen, we couldn't use it for 4-5 years.
>
> What I had initially proposed was to abuse %S, which takes a wchar_t*.
> gcc accepts `unsigned long *' for %S.
>
> Then, we put the kernel-specific control char after the S, so we can
> print an inode (rofl) with
>
> struct inode *inode;
>
> printk("here is an inode: %Si\n", (unsigned long *)inode);
>
> Downsides are:
>
> - there's a cast, so you could accidentally do
>
> printk("here is an inode: %Si\n", (unsigned long *)dentry);
>
> - there's a cast, and they're ugly
>
> - gcc cannot of course check that the arg matches the control string
>
> Unfortunately (and this seems weird), gcc printf checking will not
> accept a void* for %S: it _has_ to be wchar_t*, and the checker won't
> permit void* substitution for that.
Repeating myself here...
We can add an alternative alias to printk:
asmlinkage int printk(const char * fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2))) __cold;
+asmlinkage int custom_printk(const char * fmt, ...) __cold asm ("printk");
custom_printk() is actually just printk(), that is,
we won't need additional function, we need to teach
*printk* about MAC addresses, NIPQUADs etc;
and then use printk() if you use only standard %fmt (and have it
checked by gcc), or use custom_printk() if you have non-standard
%fmt in the format string.
The only downside that in second case, you lose gcc checking.
No big deal.
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-05 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 13:11 [PATCH] handle failure of irqchip->set_type in setup_irq Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-02 9:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-02 9:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-02 10:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 10:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 17:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-04 18:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 19:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-09 13:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-09 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-10 8:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-10 8:28 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080704111540.ddffd241.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807041147450.2815@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807041250220.2815@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20080704132716.f1e12554.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20080704204252.GM14894@parisc-linux.org>
2008-07-04 22:01 ` the printk problem Andrew Morton
2008-07-05 2:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-22 10:05 ` [PATCH] Make u64 long long on all architectures (was: the printk problem) Andrew Morton
2008-07-22 10:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-22 10:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-22 11:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-22 11:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-05 10:20 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2008-07-05 11:33 ` the printk problem Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-05 12:52 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-05 13:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-05 13:50 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-05 14:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-05 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-05 18:40 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-05 18:41 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-05 18:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-06 0:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-06 5:17 ` Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <1215212420.8970.8.camel@pasglop>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807041622270.2815@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807051523180.2847@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20080706052741.GA18928@elte.hu>
2008-07-06 5:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-06 5:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-06 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807051220.25418.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox