From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758202AbYGGVgU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:36:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755851AbYGGVgJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:36:09 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:28019 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755418AbYGGVgH (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:36:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id:from; b=MfzVq+hrEBbgVUUwzQCbR1946p4o/OvgganSkoMTAqWRwPZ3R1v+FK4b2eEvNNNe1n g3WuN4FB9VxNHeIek4xmUYsK6o0f/ZMhGf+dqLYTQ9yPhwBlbng9Y5XWw7LTiCRfjMBl erx4wko209WCQ0DmEdbbsXRw6YZqoovfvjx+M= To: rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] rt2500pci: Failed to initialize hw. But works with ancient rt2500-1.1.0 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:44:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Stefan Bauer , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200807072253.46295.stefan.bauer@cs.tu-chemnitz.de> <200807072327.17714.stefan-a-bauer@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200807072327.17714.stefan-a-bauer@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807072344.07580.IvDoorn@gmail.com> From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 07 July 2008, Stefan Bauer wrote: > Am Montag, 7. Juli 2008 schrieb Stefan Bauer: > > > dmesg 2.6.26-rc9 > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0c.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 > > phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid' > > phy0: Failed to initialize wep > > phy0 -> rt2x00lib_probe_dev: Error - Failed to initialize hw. > > rt2500pci: probe of 0000:00:0c.0 failed with error -12 > > > > .config 2.6.26-rc9 > > > > > > Next I'm going to test 2.6.24 and 2.6.25 to check whether it's an > > regression or not. > > Same problem with 2.6.24.7, I'll skip 2.6.25. What happens when you compile ecb and arc4 into the kernel instead as seperate modules? Ivo