From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755648AbYGISsW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:48:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753595AbYGISsO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:48:14 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:26322 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753175AbYGISsN (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:48:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,332,1212390000"; d="scan'208";a="9284397" Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:48:08 -0700 From: Suresh Siddha To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "mingo@elte.hu" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [patch] tip/x86_64: fix e820 merge issue which broke max_pfn_mapped Message-ID: <20080709184808.GI1678@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20080708230837.GD1678@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <86802c440807081759i3baafa9bj7e8ff544a1a78fb9@mail.gmail.com> <86802c440807081856y17eb1f1cs5647b2c2a765f429@mail.gmail.com> <20080709175621.GG1678@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <86802c440807091105g1dd8f8a0sa8220a1bfc65a79@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440807091105g1dd8f8a0sa8220a1bfc65a79@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:05:46AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > BTW, please explain the need for your patch which has more changes, instead > > of my simple patch which was test booted on 3 different systems with both > > 32bit and 64bit kernels... > > try to reduce #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64/32, and make 32/64 at the same page. But it seem to have too many changes included in one patch. like calls to e820_register_active_regions(), remove_all_active_ranges() disappeared all together in this patch.. ?? thanks, suresh