From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@neukum.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS service, was: Re: alphabetic ordering of MAINTAINERS
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:14:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080709201447.GC11006@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k5g1zv3u.fsf_-_@maximus.localdomain>
On Fri 2008-07-04 14:34:13, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> writes:
>
> >> I wanted to add an entry to MAINTAINERS and while doing it I saw that in
> >> the corresponding region the alphabetic ordering is broken. Then I
> >> inteded to fix that up for a trivial patch. Next was to check the rest
> >> of the file and there are so much misorderings that it's not sensible to
> >> choose the trivial path anymore as there are currently 114 entries out
> >> of order[1].
> >
> > What good does alphabetic ordering? You'll grep it anyway.
>
> I was thinking about a mailing list / database service instead:
> - source file/directory-based (e.g. someone could maintain whole
> drivers/, someone else drivers/char and others drivers/char/asdfg.[ch])
> - people would be able to add themselves as "observers" using mail
> and/or HTML interface
> - sending a patch would automatically trigger Cc: to all people
> registered as maintainers (or "observers") for the files modified
> - full recipient list would be present in mail sent by the service, so
> the following discussion wouldn't need it anymore. It would be used
> only for posting patches.
> - as such, I don't expect a need for spam filtering - messages
> containing no patch would be rejected in the SMTP session.
>
> Pro: no more missing Cc:, no more manual lookups and guessing, you
> just Cc: the service, possibility for "observers".
> Con: another thing to create and maintain, you don't immediately know
> who exactly has been sent a copy.
>
> I think I could create a test service but after the test phase it
> should probably go to some machine more reliable/able than mine.
If something like that existed/was useful, I guess finding hosting
would not be huge problem.
And yes, I like the idea.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-04 6:34 alphabetic ordering of MAINTAINERS Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 6:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-04 6:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 6:52 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-07-04 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 8:59 ` Paul Mundt
2008-07-04 9:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 12:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 14:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 12:02 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2008-07-04 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-07-04 12:34 ` [RFC] MAINTAINERS service, was: " Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-04 13:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-07-04 14:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-07 13:19 ` Stefan Richter
2008-07-07 18:52 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-07 19:18 ` Stefan Richter
2008-07-07 22:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-07-07 23:33 ` Stefan Richter
2008-07-09 20:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-07-09 20:11 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-04 8:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080709201447.GC11006@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox