From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758783AbYGKNBQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:01:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751726AbYGKNBB (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:01:01 -0400 Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:59373 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750844AbYGKNBA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:01:00 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add bt8xxgpio driver Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:00:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel , Marcel Holtmann , David Brownell References: <200807101914.10174.mb@bu3sch.de> <200807102112.09532.mb@bu3sch.de> <20080710163354.0cf75932@gaivota> In-Reply-To: <20080710163354.0cf75932@gaivota> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807111500.29342.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 10 July 2008 21:33:54 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:12:09 +0200 > Michael Buesch wrote: > > > > One alternative would be to make the gpio driver dependent of !VIDEO_BT848. > > > > +config GPIO_BT8XX > > + tristate "BT8XX GPIO abuser" > > + depends on PCI && VIDEO_BT848=n > > Seems fine to me. This is what's currently in the code. So I'm not sure what you are complaining about. I'm confused. -- Greetings Michael.