From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760122AbYGKUSZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:18:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756261AbYGKUR4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:17:56 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:2955 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755237AbYGKURz (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:17:55 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,347,1212390000"; d="scan'208";a="355062090" Message-Id: <20080711201442.769225000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:11:55 -0700 From: Suresh Siddha To: mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha Subject: [patch 1/3] x2apic: uninline uv_init_apic_ldr() Content-Disposition: inline; filename=fix_inline_uv.patch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew says: > There's no point in declaring it inline if it's always called indirectly. And point taken! Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha --- Index: tree-x86/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c =================================================================== --- tree-x86.orig/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c 2008-07-11 10:58:31.000000000 -0700 +++ tree-x86/arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c 2008-07-11 11:03:45.000000000 -0700 @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ return 1; } -static inline void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) +static void uv_init_apic_ldr(void) { } --