From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [osrc-patches] [PATCH] x86: Add PCI IDs for AMD Barcelona PCI devices
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:15:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714091506.GG7963@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711220837.21f7d24a@infradead.org>
On 11.07.08 22:08:37, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:56:15 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ingo, what about this patch. Could you apply it somewhere to the
> > > tip tree? I will then fix all hardcoded device entries in the code.
> >
> > i suspect we could do it if the include/linux/pci_ids.h modification
> > is fine with Jesse - it appears the maintenance policy right now is
> > for everyone to add to include/linux/pci_ids.h on an as-needed basis:
> >
> > $ git-log-line linus..linux-next include/linux/pci_ids.h
> >
> > # 1126de5: Merge commit 'mmc/next'
> > # bd3b052: Merge commit 'galak/powerpc-next'
> > # edf0e24: powerpc/85xx: Add support for MPC8536DS
> > # 34f80b0: bnx2x: Add support for BCM57711 HW
> > # d3bca0e: sdhci: support JMicron secondary interface
> > # 4ae127d: Merge branch 'master' of
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ # da65b53e4: Merge
> > branch 'master' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ #
> > da57e6983: tg3: Add 5785 ASIC revision
> >
> > Which would normally go fine and not create conflicts because the
> > modifications are distributed randomly over that file.
> >
> > I'd suggest for you to send it together with the clean up patches, so
> > that the context is clear.
Ok. Will do it that way.
>
> actually lately for most cases it seems the plan isn't to add to
> pci_ids.h, but just do the PCI ID directly. It's not like a #define
> adds any kind of information.
> Vendor ID's otoh still happen (but obviously AMD is there since
> forever.)
Since the usage of these CPU device ids is spread over the whole
kernel it makes sence to define it at a single point in
pci_ids.h. This differs to device drivers that use only a single file
with all the code, and thus, global defines are not necessary.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 14:04 [PATCH] x86: Add PCI IDs for AMD Barcelona PCI devices Robert Richter
2008-06-27 22:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-30 10:44 ` Robert Richter
2008-07-11 12:46 ` [osrc-patches] " Robert Richter
2008-07-12 4:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-12 5:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-14 9:15 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2008-07-14 15:54 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080714091506.GG7963@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox