From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] Kernel Tracepoints
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:27:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080715142710.GC20037@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216130356.12595.184.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 09:25 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:59 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > > > +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args) \
> > > > + do { \
> > > > + int i; \
> > > > + void **funcs; \
> > > > + preempt_disable(); \
> > > > + funcs = (tp)->funcs; \
> > > > + smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
> > > > + if (funcs) { \
> > > > + for (i = 0; funcs[i]; i++) { \
> > >
> > > can't you get rid of 'i' and write:
> > >
> > > void **func;
> > >
> > > preempt_disable();
> > > func = (tp)->funcs;
> > > smp_read_barrier_depends();
> > > for (; func; func++)
> > > ((void (*)(proto))func)(args);
> > > preempt_enable();
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I though there would be an optimization to do here, I'll use your
> > proposal. This code snippet is especially important since it will
> > generate instructions near every tracepoint side. Saving a few bytes
> > becomes important.
> >
> > Given that (tp)->funcs references an array of function pointers and that
> > it can be NULL, the if (funcs) test must still be there and we must use
> >
> > #define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args) \
> > do { \
> > void *func; \
> > \
> > preempt_disable(); \
> > if ((tp)->funcs) { \
> > func = rcu_dereference((tp)->funcs); \
> > for (; func; func++) { \
> > ((void(*)(proto))(func))(args); \
> > } \
> > } \
> > preempt_enable(); \
> > } while (0)
> >
> >
> > The resulting assembly is a bit more dense than my previous
> > implementation, which is good :
>
> My version also has that if ((tp)->funcs), but its hidden in the
> for (; func; func++) loop. The only thing your version does is an extra
> test of tp->funcs but without read depends barrier - not sure if that is
> ok.
>
Hrm, you are right, the implementation I just proposed is bogus. (but so
was yours) ;)
func is an iterator on the funcs array. My typing of func is thus wrong,
it should be void **. Otherwise I'm just incrementing the function
address which is plain wrong.
The read barrier is included in rcu_dereference() now. But given that we
have to take a pointer to the array as an iterator, we would have to
rcu_dereference() our iterator multiple times and then have many read
barrier depends, which we don't need. This is why I would go back to a
smp_read_barrier_depends().
Also, I use a NULL entry at the end of the funcs array as an end of
array identifier. However, I cannot use this in the for loop both as a
check for NULL array and check for NULL array element. This is why a if
() test is needed in addition to the for loop test. (this is actually
what is wrong in the implementation you proposed : you treat func both
as a pointer to the function pointer array and as a function pointer)
Something like this seems better :
#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args) \
do { \
void **it_func; \
\
preempt_disable(); \
it_func = (tp)->funcs; \
if (it_func) { \
smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
for (; *it_func; it_func++) \
((void(*)(proto))(*it_func))(args); \
} \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
What do you think ?
Mathieu
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 14:59 [patch 00/15] Tracepoints v3 for linux-next Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 01/15] Kernel Tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 13:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 14:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-07-15 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 15:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 15:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-07-15 16:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 16:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-02 0:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-02 0:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-07-15 16:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-07-15 17:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 14:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 18:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 18:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 18:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-15 19:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 19:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 19:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 02/15] Tracepoints Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 03/15] Tracepoints Samples Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 04/15] LTTng instrumentation - irq Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 16:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-09 17:05 ` [patch 04/15] LTTng instrumentation - irq (update) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 15:34 ` [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler (repost) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 16:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 16:21 ` [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler (merge ftrace markers) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 19:09 ` [PATCH] ftrace port to tracepoints (linux-next) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-10 3:14 ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-07-10 3:57 ` [PATCH] ftrace port to tracepoints (linux-next) (nitpick update) Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20080711143709.GB11500@Krystal>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0807141112540.30484@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20080714153334.GA651@Krystal>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0807141153250.29493@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
2008-07-14 16:25 ` [PATCH] ftrace memory barriers Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-14 16:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 06/15] LTTng instrumentation - timer Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 07/15] LTTng instrumentation - kernel Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 08/15] LTTng instrumentation - filemap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 09/15] LTTng instrumentation - swap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 10/15] LTTng instrumentation - memory page faults Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 11/15] LTTng instrumentation - page Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 12/15] LTTng instrumentation - hugetlb Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-11 14:30 ` [patch 12/15] LTTng instrumentation - hugetlb (update) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 13/15] LTTng instrumentation - net Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` [patch 14/15] LTTng instrumentation - ipv4 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 14:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-09 17:01 ` [patch 00/15] Tracepoints v3 for linux-next Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-09 17:11 ` [patch 15/15] LTTng instrumentation - ipv6 Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080715142710.GC20037@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox