From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756387AbYGQH2H (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:28:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752722AbYGQH1z (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:27:55 -0400 Received: from mta23.gyao.ne.jp ([125.63.38.249]:58314 "EHLO mx.gate01.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867AbYGQH1z (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:27:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:27:31 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Grant Likely Cc: petkovbb@googlemail.com, jrigby@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile Message-ID: <20080717072731.GB12273@linux-sh.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Mundt , Grant Likely , petkovbb@googlemail.com, jrigby@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <20080717070549.30755.13083.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080717070549.30755.13083.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:06:55AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > From: Grant Likely > > The patch named "powerpc/mpc5121: Add clock driver", also contained > an unrelated and bogus change to the top-level makefile. This patch > backs out the bad bit. > > SHA1 of offending patch: 137e95906e294913fab02162e8a1948ade49acb5) > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > --- > > If the maintainer who picked up this patch (Grant Likely) had done > his job, this cack-up never would have happened. Why do we still > have to deal with such sloppy individuals? > I think the more important question is why the hell would anyone put that in a Makefile, ever? ;-)