From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@sun.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 on latest -git: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000c
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:43:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080717144342.GA15844@unused.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0807170800q13cc021dyed27c665c25ac520@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Ok run dumpe2fs -h on your image and see if you have a line that says
> >
> > Errors behavior: Continue
> >
> > if you do run tune2fs -e remount-ro and then do the mount. That would explain
> > why you are still having panics even though we should be aborting the journal.
> > Thanks,
>
> Ahh, that probably explains it. I didn't realize there was such a thing.
>
> I am doing random-corruption tests, so it is quite possible that this
> bit gets set anywhere along the road...
>
> But even so, is it correct that the kernel should crash? It seems
> quite possible that error behaviour can change (like this) even with
> "normal" corruption, e.g. outside my test scripts.
>
Yeah thats a hard to answer question, one that I will leave up to others who
have been doing this much longer than I. My thought is remount-ro is there to
keep you from crashing, so if you have errors=continue then you expect to live
with the consequences. Course if that bit gets flipped via corruption thats not
good either. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 12:51 ext3 on latest -git: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000c Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 13:13 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 13:20 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 13:34 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 13:39 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 13:40 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 13:57 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 14:25 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 14:13 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 14:35 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 14:16 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 14:44 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 14:33 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-17 15:00 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 14:43 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2008-07-17 23:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-18 10:51 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-18 11:32 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-18 11:20 ` Josef Bacik
2008-07-18 11:58 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-18 20:28 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 15:08 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-17 15:16 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-17 15:40 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-17 23:06 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080717144342.GA15844@unused.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox