From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: use kstrdup()
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:09:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080721070950.GA6662@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080721070346.GA28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[Al Viro - Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 08:03:46AM +0100]
| On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:29:47PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
| > > FWIW, it _is_ a good question.
| > >
| > > * is all code treating ->mnt_devname as optional? AFAICS, there's
| > > at least one place in NFS that doesn't. We could treat failing allocation
| > > the same way we treat failing allocation of vfsmount itself - callers can
| > > cope with that already.
| >
| > I just did a cleanup, and the original code didn't check for NULL.
|
| I know.
|
| > I just looked into the git history, and I found out since fs/namespace.c was
| > created in v2.4.10.4, the code has never changed to check for failing
| > allocation of ->mnt_devname.
|
| It used to have no users beyond fs/namespace.c itself and for _those_ the
| thing had been optional, so leaving NULL had been OK. Unfortunately, it
| still had been a bad idea - new users had appeared and those predictably
| didn't notice that fun detail.
|
| The right thing here is to consider failing allocation of ->mnt_devname
| as failure of the entire alloc.
|
Hi Al,
thanks a lot for comments! I think it is more then enough for now (i'm
about failing allocation in whole). If that happens and we are not able
to duplicate string - it's quite probable we will be in serious troubles
soon anyway ('cause of further kmalloc calls). So it's better to get
mount allocation fails then NULL deref.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-19 10:16 [PATCH] vfs: use kstrdup() Li Zefan
2008-07-19 11:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-19 13:13 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-19 13:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 5:27 ` Al Viro
2008-07-21 6:29 ` Li Zefan
2008-07-21 7:03 ` Al Viro
2008-07-21 7:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-07-21 8:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 8:28 ` Li Zefan
2008-07-21 8:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 8:59 ` Li Zefan
2008-07-21 9:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-21 10:05 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 10:10 ` Li Zefan
2008-07-21 10:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 9:12 ` Al Viro
2008-07-21 8:28 ` Al Viro
2008-07-21 8:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-07-21 8:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080721070950.GA6662@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox