From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754887AbYGUOYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:24:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752521AbYGUOX4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:23:56 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55204 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752033AbYGUOXz (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:23:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:23:43 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI tree Message-ID: <20080721142343.GA11345@elte.hu> References: <20080721114321.GA28786@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080721114321.GA28786@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > This reverts some double commits and a trouble some FADT patch. > Andi Kleen (4): > Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled." in that commit log you say: Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled." Revert double commit by mistake. Noticed by Thomas Gleixner. it wasnt just "noticed" by Thomas, he sent a reverter patch with commit message and patch included. Why didnt you simply apply the patch from Thomas? Ingo