From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2]
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:10:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080723221033.GD13662@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080723111928.15828.42561.sendpatchset@prarit.bos.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:19:43AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> pci_alloc_consistent/dma_alloc_coherent does not return size aligned
> addresses.
>
> >From Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt:
>
> "pci_alloc_consistent returns two values: the virtual address which you
> can use to access it from the CPU and dma_handle which you pass to the
> card.
>
> The cpu return address and the DMA bus master address are both
> guaranteed to be aligned to the smallest PAGE_SIZE order which
> is greater than or equal to the requested size. This invariant
> exists (for example) to guarantee that if you allocate a chunk
> which is smaller than or equal to 64 kilobytes, the extent of the
> buffer you receive will not cross a 64K boundary."
Interesting. Have you experienced any problems because of that
misbehavior in the GART code? AMD IOMMU currently also violates this
requirement. I will send a patch to fix that there too.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 11:19 [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2] Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-23 22:10 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2008-07-23 23:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-23 23:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 7:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-07-24 10:09 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 10:34 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 12:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-07-24 12:49 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 13:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 14:31 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 14:40 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-24 15:13 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-24 14:45 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-28 22:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-29 14:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-29 17:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-30 0:43 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-06 12:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-06 13:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-06 13:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-06 14:32 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-07 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-08-07 17:41 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-08 7:12 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-08-08 15:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-08 16:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-08-08 21:13 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-09 1:40 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-09 3:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-15 16:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 20:39 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-08-15 21:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-16 1:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 15:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 15:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-17 15:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-07 17:45 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-07-23 23:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-23 23:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080723221033.GD13662@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox