From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>,
mgross@linux.intel.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
hmh@hmh.eng.br, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:01:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080724100144.GA8301@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724074124.GB2254@local>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:41:25AM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:19:18PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 06:00:29PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > The need for an industrialio subsystem was discussed in
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/20/135
> >
> > The name is really bad, this sounds like something for doing large
> > scale industrial process control.
>
> Well, it says "Industrial I/O". To me, this means it handles I/O devices
> typically found in industrial applications.
Yes, industrial is generally process control of manufacturing
processes which in my view is making this sound like it is limiting
the field of operations.
All the applications we would currently need are things like
handheld PDA type devices which are hardly 'industrial' or small
consumer measurement systems.
> >
> > > Firstly thanks to all the people who have contributed to the discussion
> > > of this in the past.
> > >
> > > In brief the intention is provide a kernel subsystem directed towards the
> > > handling on sensors (and later related output devices) such as ADC's,
> > > accelerometers and many others.
> >
> > We've already got an perfectly good hwmon framework, do we really need
> > to do this again?
>
> hwmon is designed for slow I/O. It won't handle an ADC that does a few
> megasamples/sec.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 17:00 [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:08 ` [Patch 1/4] Industrialio Core Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 18:31 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-07-24 10:12 ` [spi-devel-general] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 19:42 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 10:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 9:01 ` Eric Piel
2008-07-24 11:56 ` [spi-devel-general] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:11 ` [Patch 2/4] Max1363 (and similar) ADCs Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:14 ` [Patch 3/4] ST LIS3L02DQ accelerometer Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-23 17:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:17 ` [Patch 4/4] VTI SCA3000 Series accelerometer driver Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 17:48 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-24 9:44 ` Eric Piel
2008-07-24 10:08 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 12:20 ` [spi-devel-general] " Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:37 ` Eric Piel
2008-07-24 12:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 13:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-24 13:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 18:36 ` David Brownell
2008-07-23 19:19 ` [spi-devel-general] " Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 7:41 ` Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 9:19 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-24 12:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 10:01 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2008-07-24 15:38 ` Hans J. Koch
2008-07-24 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 12:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-23 19:33 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-24 17:57 ` [Patch 5/4] IndustrialIO subsystem very early cut of documentation + userspace demo Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-24 22:25 ` [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc) Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-25 11:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-07-25 11:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080724100144.GA8301@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com \
--cc=bn@niasdigital.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox