From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756239AbYGXMeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:34:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752632AbYGXMd4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:33:56 -0400 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-6-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.16]:18605 "EHLO mk-outboundfilter-6-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751990AbYGXMdz (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:33:55 -0400 X-Trace: 5949795/mk-outboundfilter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/f2s-nildram-customers/195.149.44.6 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 195.149.44.6 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: alistair@devzero.co.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8EAFwTiEjDlSwG/2dsb2JhbACBWrAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,246,1215385200"; d="scan'208";a="5949795" X-IP-Direction: IN From: Alistair John Strachan To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:33:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Johannes Berg , Pierre Ossman , "John W. Linville" , Jean Tourrilhes , LKML References: <20080724115805.5466c217@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <1216900631.7257.321.camel@twins> <20080724051113.fa14f7ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080724051113.fa14f7ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807241333.52206.alistair@devzero.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:11:13 Andrew Morton wrote: > : + Say Y if you have programs using it (we don't know of any). Probably would have been less confusing if the Kconfig message actually lined up with the note about older HALs in feature-removal-schedule.txt. Saying "we don't know of any" seems inaccurate. This should really be something like "old HAL versions" or perhaps even better "HAL <= X.Y.Z". I'm sure distributors will have the common sense to stop enabling the option in the future. In the mean time, removing the deceptive summary would hopefully avoid such bug reports. -- Cheers, Alistair.