From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755091AbYGXTOp (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:14:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753198AbYGXTOg (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:14:36 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.187]:52322 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752999AbYGXTOc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:14:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=A5nVXd5ZepN9LocIlIdWXzi8DvBrIaO6AfIfYyWAVZCW2PGCWPQ4ShwxOkvLXX8qXM Ps2ToklPxTJ1u+Q+H5DhBUH0EXOnTlRx/aXD0hCKYIZ7P3KHY1kF2NteB72uw8C2/Or5 n4UelmDl2s/1p49sxxpsEDZj2SX2czethFsP8= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: add missing ATA_ID_* defines (take 2) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:53:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200807222249.32242.bzolnier@gmail.com> <48879938.8010803@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <48879938.8010803@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807242053.38082.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Add missing ATA_ID_* defines and update {ata,atapi}_*() > > inlines accordingly. The currently unused defines are > > needed for the forthcoming drivers/ide/ changes. > > > > v2: > > Add ATA_ID_SPG. > > > > Cc: Jeff Garzik > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > --- > > v2 was needed because one define got lost :/ > > > > include/linux/ata.h | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > ACK, and I'll send this one upstream myself. It shouldn't conflict with > the patches just ACK'd. OK.