From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758163AbYG1P0U (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:26:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752349AbYG1P0J (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:26:09 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45335 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753620AbYG1P0I (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:26:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:25:18 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCHES for 2.6.27] V4L/DVB updates Message-ID: <20080728122518.77cea66e@gaivota> In-Reply-To: <20080728081813.423ac50c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20080727224104.78b8298d@gaivota> <20080727204256.bba5eaf6.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080728081813.423ac50c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.13.5; x86_64-mandriva-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:18:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:08:27 -0400 (EDT) Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Hi Randy, > > > > > I'd really like to get this patch that I mailed to you 2008-July-21 merged... > > > > Your patch looks OK to me. However, this function were moved to > > v4l2-dev.c, by the V4L core changes (the changes broke videodev into two > > different files, and did some improvements there). > > > > Do you mind to rebase your patch? > > What tree contains v4l2-dev.c? > It's not in today's linux-next. Shouldn't it be, or is it for after 2.6.27? I've changed my procedures to generate my trees, to avoid needing to rebase all branches (the idea is to have just for_linus rebased). Due to that change, only yesterday I fixed the updates for linux-next (also, I've applied the pending patches only yesterday, including the ones that touched on V4L core). Probably, that's the reason why linux-next is not updated. Let's see if tomorrow's version will be ok. At the meantime, you can use my -git tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git;a=summary Cheers, Mauro.