public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Tomáš Janoušek" <tomi@nomi.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-dev: stop periodic interrupts on device release
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:05:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807281505.37122.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728204136.GA6683@nomi.cz>

On Monday 28 July 2008, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:50:55PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > Hmm, I'd think that something like an rtc_dev_ioctl(PIE_OFF) would be

Typo, by the way ... I meant UIE_OFF.


> > preferable here ... so that it's not just UIE_EMUL logic which turns
> > off the one-per-second update IRQs.
> 
> I think it'd be more consistent if the framework only called the rtc api
> functions.

When they exist, sure.  But they currently don't, and I see no value
in adding them just to avoid a simple rtc_dev_ioctl(UIE_OFF) call.
It'd be different if any in-kernel code used update IRQs ... NTP sync?

(Regardless, that's a separate bug and appropriate for a different patch.)


> Like: if the driver doesn't export an op for it and handles it in 
> the ioctl op, it itself should be responsible to clear the irq in its release
> op. (I know there's no op for UIE, so we'd better add it instead of calling
> ioctl in the framework's release function.)

I still think the *existence* of a release() op is a problem.  It's
requiring the drivers to maintain history they should never need.

Surely you agree that having the framework shut down only *emulated*
update IRQs, not "real" ones, is inconsistent?  And hence undesirable?

- Dave


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-28 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-26 15:46 [PATCH] rtc-dev: stop periodic interrupts on device release Tomas Janousek
2008-07-26 17:55 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-07-26 18:06   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2008-07-26 18:13     ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-07-26 19:58       ` David Brownell
2008-07-26 20:50 ` David Brownell
2008-07-27  3:03   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-07-27  5:03     ` David Brownell
2008-07-28 20:41   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2008-07-28 20:47     ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-07-28 22:05     ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-07-28 23:36       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2008-07-29 20:08         ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807281505.37122.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi@nomi.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox