From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757572AbYG1PJR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:09:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751205AbYG1PJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:09:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38470 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752400AbYG1PJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:09:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:08:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Eduardo Habkost , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: call early_cpu_init at the same point Message-ID: <20080728150844.GD32111@elte.hu> References: <488520A2.1080701@goop.org> <20080724102856.GB28817@elte.hu> <4888A410.3020108@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4888A410.3020108@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0431] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >> >>> Call early_cpu_init() at the same (early) point in setup_arch(). The >>> x86_64 code was calling it relatively late, after when other arch >>> code need to do cpu-related setup which depends on it. >>> >> >> applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks Jeremy. > > Thanks. Curious to see if this causes any breakage, especially in > numa-ish type systems. no badness so far. Ingo