public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FILESYSTEMS: Make "advanced partitions" immediately unselectable.
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:17:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729091707.d82b389a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807290634510.7057@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:36:09 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:02:20 -0400 Calvin Walton wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:42 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > it strikes me that, at least on x86, MSDOS partition support is so
> > > > fundamental that it should take work for someone to turn it *off*.
> > > > perhaps simply have it on by default, and force someone to go under
> > > > "Configure standard kernel features (for small systems)"
> > > > (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) to make it go away?
> > > >
> > > >   seriously, how often is someone going to build a kernel for x86 and
> > > > not need MSDOS partition support?  just curious.
> > > >
> > > > rday
> > >
> > > Naturally, on an architecture other than x86 (e.g. sparc) you'll want to
> > > ensure that the platform's native partitioning format (for sparc,
> > > SUN_PARTITION) is similarly on by default, and difficult to unselect.
> > >
> > > In this case, you could get by perfectly without msdos partitions
> > > enabled (although the default is still to enable them), unless you want
> > > to read a usb key or something.
> > >
> > > This was the point of the original menu, I think - it allowed each
> > > partition type to have a default based on arch, but to hide away the
> > > mess of other types unless you feel like overriding it.
> > >
> > > You'll want to make sure in your patch that arches other than x86 don't
> > > lose their own native partitioning types :)
> >
> > Thanks.  I won't bother pushing the latest patch.  :)
> 
> so, just to be clear, the consensus is to just leave it alone as it's
> more trouble than it's worth to do anything about?

Probably.

I don't see the "if PARTITION_ADVANCED" block as being compatible with the
need to have default partition types per $ARCH.
Do you see some way around that problem?

---
~Randy
Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-26 13:20 [PATCH] FILESYSTEMS: Make "advanced partitions" immediately unselectable Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-26 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-26 21:52   ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-28  3:11     ` Calvin Walton
2008-07-28  9:38       ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-28 17:37         ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-28 18:14           ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-28 18:42           ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-28 18:51             ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-28 18:56               ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-28 21:43             ` Grant Coady
2008-07-28 22:02             ` Calvin Walton
2008-07-28 22:14               ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-29 10:36                 ` Robert P. J. Day
2008-07-29 16:17                   ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-07-29 20:36                     ` Robert P. J. Day
     [not found] <aTS0O-4U1-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <aTV89-39s-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <aTZYh-4i3-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <aUrrl-78m-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <aUxwQ-1Hn-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <aUERB-Zl-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <aUFXh-3m9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <aUJ4U-1xe-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]               ` <aUJeD-1N6-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                 ` <aUUME-5MM-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                   ` <aV05W-1wO-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-08-02 12:41                     ` Bodo Eggert
2008-08-02 14:36                       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-08-02 21:16                         ` Bodo Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080729091707.d82b389a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=calvin.walton@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox