From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: module-placed markers/tracepoints
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:41:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729224115.GA5209@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729211543.GB17097@redhat.com>
* Frank Ch. Eigler (fche@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Some locals are wondering -- is there code for (or need for new code
> for) incrementing module reference counts while markers and/or
> tracepoints resident in modules have active clients?
>
> - FChE
Hi Frank,
Probe module unloading is supposed to be done automatically assuming the
following module unload behavior :
1 - Module unload code takes the stop machine lock.
2 - It is assumed that the module exit function is called at that time,
while no preempt-disabled section is executed. This function
unregisters the callbacks.
3 - Given that preemption is disabled around tracepoint/marker calls, no
calls are left to a freed module.
Actually, I notice that it might not be the case. I took for granted
what (I can't remember who ? Rusty ?) told me about module unload code.
If we look at sys_delete_module() :
/* Stop the machine so refcounts can't move and disable module. */
ret = try_stop_module(mod, flags, &forced);
if (ret != 0)
goto out;
/* Never wait if forced. */
if (!forced && module_refcount(mod) != 0)
wait_for_zero_refcount(mod);
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
/* Final destruction now noone is using it. */
if (mod->exit != NULL)
mod->exit();
So we see that mod->exit(), which I believe is responsible for calling
the module exit() functions, is called after the stop_machine, not
during the stop machine.
Therefore, what would be needed here is to add a synchronize_sched()
after mod->exit() in module.c or after each tracepoint/marker unregister
in marker.c/tracepoint.c. However, I'd really prefer to add this to
module.c since adding this for _every_ unregister will slow down
processing or multiple probe unregistration too much.
Rusty, am I understanding that correctly ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 15:57 [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 1/4] kvm move VMCS Encodings to system headers Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 2/4] kvm move VMCS read " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 3/4] KVM move register read-write " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 4/4] KVM-trace port to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-17 17:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 16:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-22 18:46 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-23 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 13:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 18:42 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace " Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:16 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 19:31 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:54 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 22:12 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints -> LTTng ? Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-27 10:11 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-28 0:54 ` [RFC] LTTng merge plan Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-29 16:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 17:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20080729211543.GB17097@redhat.com>
2008-07-29 22:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-07-29 23:01 ` module-placed markers/tracepoints Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 23:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 1:40 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-30 2:27 ` [PATCH] Module : call synchronize_sched() between module exit() and free Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 3:04 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-30 4:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 11:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-30 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-31 0:54 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080729224115.GA5209@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox