Re: Request for documentation of PID handling functions

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>]

On 07/30, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> > 
> > Can you please provide documentation for the PID handling functions you
> > supplied in commit:
> > 
> > 	7af5729474b5b8ad385adadab78d6e723e7655a3
> > 
> > In particular I'd like to know what locks are required when.  I'm trying to
> > determine if in this piece of code:
> > 
> > 		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > 		ret = 0;
> > 		if (pid != task_pid_vnr(current))
> > 			ret = -EPERM;
> > 		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > 
> > the lock of tasklist_lock is necessary.
> 
> The RCU protection is enough to get pids from tasks. However, the pids
> are detached under the tasklist lock write-locked, so provided you're
> *already* sitting under it the RCU is excessive.

Yes, tasklist OR rcu is enough.

But, since the task == current, the code above doesn't need any locks at all.

Unless this code runs after exit_notify() of course, in that case we need
rcu/tasklist and task_pid_vnr(current) can return 0.

Oleg.