From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761641AbYG3MNl (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756335AbYG3MNV (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:21 -0400 Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.ORG ([69.25.196.31]:58979 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755962AbYG3MNV (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:01 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: mcs6502@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/31] pci_ids.h, kernel 2.6.27-rc1, sort DEVICE_IDs within VENDOR_IDs Message-ID: <20080730121301.GA8283@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , mcs6502@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:50:50PM +1000, mcs6502@gmail.com wrote: > The following 31 patches attempt to bring pci_ids.h back into order. Why not just fold this into one patch? I can't think of a good reason to do this one vendor at a time. (Aside from someone trying to do Signed-off-by: Statistics whoring, of course. :-) - Ted