From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module : call synchronize_sched() between module exit() and free.
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:04:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807301304.51014.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080730022751.GA15866@Krystal>
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:27:51 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > Yes: stop_machine is merely used to atomically check the module
> > refcount for zero and set the state so it can't be incremented again (ie.
> > try_module_get will fail).
> >
> > So placing a tracepoint or marker in a module does not bump the module
> > refcount? If that's true, then there needs to be some kind of
> > remove_markers_from_module() call after module->exit(), which should do
> > the synchronize_sched() or whatever, right?
> >
> > Rusty.
>
> Actually, it's not placing a marker/tracepoint in a module which causes
> a problem, this is a simple function call after all, and correctly dealt
> with by current module.c code.
>
> The problem comes from a probe function (the callback) that would be
> registered to be called from a marker and would sit in an unloadable
> kernel module. I would not want to tie the refcount of the probe modules
> to the fact that they are connected to a marker because it would then
> become impossible to unload them due to the fact that unregistration is
> done in module exit().
Hi Mathieu,
Still confused, sorry. Why don't you don't do a synchronize_sched() at
the end of your module's exit routine? "You must be completely finished by
the time ->exit() returns" is the rule so far...
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 15:57 [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 1/4] kvm move VMCS Encodings to system headers Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 2/4] kvm move VMCS read " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 3/4] KVM move register read-write " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 4/4] KVM-trace port to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-17 17:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 16:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-22 18:46 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-23 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 13:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 18:42 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace " Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:16 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 19:31 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:54 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 22:12 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints -> LTTng ? Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-27 10:11 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-28 0:54 ` [RFC] LTTng merge plan Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-29 16:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 17:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20080729211543.GB17097@redhat.com>
2008-07-29 22:41 ` module-placed markers/tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-29 23:01 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 23:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 1:40 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-30 2:27 ` [PATCH] Module : call synchronize_sched() between module exit() and free Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 3:04 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-07-30 4:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 11:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-30 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-31 0:54 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807301304.51014.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox