From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:25:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730142545.GA25835@sgi.com> (raw)
I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming
that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig?
Should this be changed for the x86 architecture?
config HOTPLUG_CPU
bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 14:25 Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
[not found] <fa.NXaOVSU/kxtRXoZokQC2Y0/po4M@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-30 19:29 ` CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 Robert Hancock
2008-07-30 19:37 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080730142545.GA25835@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox