* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86
@ 2008-07-30 14:25 Dimitri Sivanich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dimitri Sivanich @ 2008-07-30 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming
that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig?
Should this be changed for the x86 architecture?
config HOTPLUG_CPU
bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86
[not found] <fa.NXaOVSU/kxtRXoZokQC2Y0/po4M@ifi.uio.no>
@ 2008-07-30 19:29 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-30 19:37 ` Max Krasnyansky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hancock @ 2008-07-30 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dimitri Sivanich; +Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming
> that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig?
> Should this be changed for the x86 architecture?
>
> config HOTPLUG_CPU
> bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
Yes, it's a bit bizarre that something needed for suspending almost any
current laptop is still marked as "experimental"..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86
2008-07-30 19:29 ` Robert Hancock
@ 2008-07-30 19:37 ` Max Krasnyansky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Max Krasnyansky @ 2008-07-30 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Hancock
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich, linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
>> I've heard folks say that hotplug cpu is very reliable. I'm assuming
>> that's in the context of the x86 architecture. If so, how come
>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL in arch/x86/Kconfig?
>> Should this be changed for the x86 architecture?
>>
>> config HOTPLUG_CPU
>> bool "Support for suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs
>> (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
>
> Yes, it's a bit bizarre that something needed for suspending almost any
> current laptop is still marked as "experimental"..
Why don't use guys just submit a patch that removes EXPERIMENTAL thing.
Max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-30 19:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-30 14:25 CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 Dimitri Sivanich
[not found] <fa.NXaOVSU/kxtRXoZokQC2Y0/po4M@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-30 19:29 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-30 19:37 ` Max Krasnyansky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox