From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86: use arch/x86/include
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730183201.GA26389@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4890B153.6050305@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi x86 guys.
>>>
>>> It turned out to be easy to enable um to use arch/x86/include so here
>>> is a git pull.
>>
>> hm, we have a _ton_ of changes to include files queued up already, so
>> this is rather inconvenient.
>
> Git *should* be able to track those changes across a rename and even
> with a rename on one branch and changes on another; in my experience
> it works well for filename renames, but git doesn't understand
> directory renames at all, so new files do have to be moved to their
> new locations manually.
yes, it copes in some cases - but i've had rather bad experiences with
it.
the reason i raised this is because i tried to pull Sam's renames, and
they created 48 conflicts.
>> I missed the discussion on this, what's the point of renaming all these
>> files?
>
> I know there has been talk about this on and off for a long time (to
> get all the arch code into arch/). I don't know if there are any
> mechanical reasons for it, on top of that.
hm, seems rather pointless to me, i thought there might be some better
reasons for it. Historically we've put all include files into
include/asm-* - why upset the decade-long status quo now without strong
technical reasons?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 12:49 [GIT PULL] x86: use arch/x86/include Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30 18:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-30 18:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-30 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-30 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 18:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-30 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-30 19:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-31 23:15 ` Tony Luck
2008-07-31 23:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080730183201.GA26389@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox