From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: implement multiple queues for smp function call IPIs
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:09:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801090910.GA3282@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4892980A.2010101@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Yes on the 64-bit side we've had NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS (==8) for a
>> long time, but note that 64-bit is obviously for more modern CPUs. What
>> i'm mindful about (i'm not _that_ worried) are fragile APICs and
>> unknown erratas.
>>
>
> Well, the whole exercise is only useful if you have a relatively large
> number of CPUs, which presumably means you have relatively modern
> APICs. If we set the number of queues to 1 for < 4 CPUs, would that
> avoid the problem APICs?
hm, but such special casing would reduce testing exposure and would also
needlessly penalize boxes that work perfectly fine.
So ... how about my original suggestion, to add a (default-off) boot
option that reduces the queues to 1? I.e. lets have something in place
from day 1 on that could be quirk-handler-driven, should the need arise.
"apic=simpleipi" or something like that.
In a year or two, once this all has proven itself fine on a broad range
of systems, we'll laugh out loud at being so cautious and can remove the
boot option for good ;-)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 23:32 [PATCH 2/2] x86: implement multiple queues for smp function call IPIs Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-29 23:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-30 0:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-30 0:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-30 4:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-31 22:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-31 22:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-31 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-01 4:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-01 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-08-01 14:17 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801090910.GA3282@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox