From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/17] RCU read sched
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:10:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801211025.GR14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715222746.136282703@polymtl.ca>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 06:26:05PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Add rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched() to rcupdate.h to match the
> recently added write-side call_rcu_sched() and rcu_barrier_sched(). They also
> match the no-so-recently-added synchronize_sched().
>
> It will help following matching use of the update/read lock primitives. Those
> new read lock will replace preempt_disable()/enable() used in pair with
> RCU-classic synchronization.
Looks good, but...
synchronize_sched(), call_rcu_sched(), and rcu_barrier_sched() can also
pair up with:
o local_irq_save() and local_irq_restore()
o local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable()
o spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_lock_irqrestore()
o etc. etc.
I do very much like the idea of marking the intent of matching with
RCU, but am getting a bit queasy about adding rcu_read_lock_sched_irq()
and so on.
Thoughts? Other than having an rcu_read_lock_sched_nop() or some
other window-dressing macro that doesn't really do anything? (Which
might really be the right thing to do...)
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: Paul E McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-07-15 15:28:08.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-07-15 17:38:02.000000000 -0400
> @@ -133,6 +133,24 @@ struct rcu_head {
> #define rcu_read_unlock_bh() __rcu_read_unlock_bh()
>
> /**
> + * rcu_read_lock_sched - mark the beginning of a RCU-classic critical section
> + *
> + * Should be used with either
> + * - synchronize_sched()
> + * or
> + * - call_rcu_sched() and rcu_barrier_sched()
> + * on the write-side to insure proper synchronization.
> + */
> +#define rcu_read_lock_sched() preempt_disable()
> +
> +/*
> + * rcu_read_unlock_sched - marks the end of a RCU-classic critical section
> + *
> + * See rcu_read_lock_sched for more information.
> + */
> +#define rcu_read_unlock_sched() preempt_enable()
> +
> +/**
> * rcu_dereference - fetch an RCU-protected pointer in an
> * RCU read-side critical section. This pointer may later
> * be safely dereferenced.
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 22:26 [patch 00/17] Tracepoints v4 for linux-next Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 01/17] RCU read sched Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-08-01 23:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 02/17] Kernel Tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-24 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-24 20:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-01 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-04 15:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-24 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-24 20:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-24 22:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-24 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-24 20:37 ` [PATCH] Tracepoints use TABLE_SIZE macro Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 03/17] Tracepoints Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 04/17] Tracepoints Samples Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 05/17] LTTng instrumentation - irq Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 06/17] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 07/17] LTTng instrumentation - timer Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 08/17] LTTng instrumentation - kernel Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-24 13:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-24 14:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-24 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 09/17] LTTng instrumentation - filemap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 6:25 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-17 7:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 7:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 10/17] LTTng instrumentation - swap Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 15:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 15:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-07-16 16:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 11/17] LTTng instrumentation - memory page faults Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 12/17] LTTng instrumentation - page Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 15:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 13/17] LTTng instrumentation - hugetlb Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 14/17] LTTng instrumentation - net Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 15/17] LTTng instrumentation - ipv4 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 16/17] LTTng instrumentation - ipv6 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-15 22:26 ` [patch 17/17] ftrace port to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-16 8:51 ` [patch 00/17] Tracepoints v4 for linux-next Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 15:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801211025.GR14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox