From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack().
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:44:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801214448.GA13448@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27552.1217599279@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>
> > + * In some cases (e.g. Hyper-Threading), we want to avoid L1
> > + * evictions by the processes running on the same package. One
> > + * thing we can do is to shuffle the initial stack for them, so
> > + * we give the architecture an opportunity to do so here.
> > + */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > - sp = bprm->p;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(bprm->p);
> > #else
> > - sp = mm->start_stack;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(mm->start_stack);
>
> Ummm... You're calling arch_align_stack() under NOMMU... Is that really a
> good idea?
>
Not particularly, no.
> You can't necessarily move the stack pointer without exiting the allocated
> region or shrinking the amount of stack space the executable asked for. If
> you want to do this sort of thing, you need to tell the memory allocator what
> you're up to - or at the very least allocate some slack.
>
Yes, that's a good point, and one that probably ought to be documented
alongside the initial alignment. I'll send an updated patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 15:03 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: auxvec updates Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Support auxvec base platform string Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Wire up AT_EXECFD, AT_EXECFN, AT_SECURE Paul Mundt
2008-08-01 14:04 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() David Howells
2008-08-01 21:44 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2008-08-04 3:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-08-04 4:00 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-04 10:08 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Support auxvec base platform string David Howells
2008-08-01 21:46 ` Paul Mundt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-06 10:34 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: auxvec updates, v2 Paul Mundt
2008-08-06 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801214448.GA13448@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox