From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757600AbYHBQxn (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:53:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755461AbYHBQxh (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:53:37 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:41002 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754786AbYHBQxh (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:53:37 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:53:34 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset: use seq_cpumask(), seq_nodemask() Message-Id: <20080802115334.dd2732af.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080802142838.GA338@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <20080802113131.GB3536@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20080802090542.51052006.pj@sgi.com> <20080802142838.GA338@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexey wrote: > That's just a reminder to cpuset people whether /proc/*/status broken or > not. Can be safely deleted. :-) What can be safely deleted - the patch, or the comment of the patch? I'm confused. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214