From: sukadev@us.ibm.com
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
serue@us.ibm.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: Per-instance devpts
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080803174646.GA20254@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080803130439.743ff0ae@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk] wrote:
| > > 1. /dev/ptmx would have to change to a symlink, ptmx -> pts/ptmx.
| >
| > IIRC, /dev/tty also needs a similar symlink.
|
| Making them symlinks is asking for trouble because some code does go
| around using stat and the like and tools like MAKEDEV have definite ideas.
|
| For /dev/tty the definition is precisely that it is your controlling
| tty. No reference to namespace and a task whose controlling tty is in a
| different namespace should still open the controlling tty not some
| parallel in another universe when you open /dev/tty.
Well, I thought the problem was something like this:
If /dev/pts/1 is the controlling terminal and there are multiple mounts
of devpts, when we open /dev/tty, kernel would somehow have to find the
right instance of devpts.
When init_dev() calls devpts_get_tty(), it would need to specify the devpts
instance. So tty_open() of "/dev/tty" would somehow have to find it based on
the /dev/tty inode (which could be in ext3).
(I thought the issue was similar with /dev/ptmx, ptmx allocates a new
index, /dev/tty accesses an existing index, but both need to somehow
find the right pts instance -no ?)
|
| If you want to make sure the controlling tty is in the right namespace
| that can be done in userspace when transferring control into a namespace.
| In many cases I doubt that is even what is wanted.
|
| > > 2. Permissions on /dev/ptmx would not be persistent, and would have to
| > > be set via devpts mount options (unless they're 0666 root.tty, which
| > > would presumably be the default.)
| > > 3. The /proc/sys/kernel/pty limit would be global; a per-filesystem
| > > limit could be added on top or instead (presumably via a filesystem
| > > mount options.)
| > >
| > > I worry #1 would have substantial user-space impact, but I don't see a way
| > > around it, since there would be no obvious way to associate /dev/ptmx with
| > > a filesystem.
|
| /dev/tty and /dev/ptmx already primarily operate by identifying a device
| and switching the work to that. Actually putting a bit of namespace logic
| in the driver code so the actual files stay as expected (device nodes
| etc) seems a *lot* simpler than trying to do symlink hacks.
|
| Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-03 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-12 17:29 [PATCH 0/4] Helper patches for PTY namespaces sukadev
2008-04-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/4]: Propagate error code from devpts_pty_new sukadev
2008-04-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/4]: Factor out PTY index allocation sukadev
2008-04-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/4]: Move devpts globals into init_pts_ns sukadev
2008-04-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 4/4]: Enable multiple mounts of /dev/pts sukadev
2008-04-12 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] Helper patches for PTY namespaces H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-12 18:35 ` Al Viro
2008-04-12 18:54 ` Multiple instances of devpts H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-12 19:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-12 19:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-12 19:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-12 19:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] Helper patches for PTY namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-13 0:59 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-01 18:12 ` Per-instance devpts H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-01 19:23 ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-01 19:35 ` Al Viro
2008-08-01 19:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <f73f7ab80808020004j15b0d0e5x5fa911242641b34d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-02 7:06 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-08-02 15:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-02 8:54 ` Bastian Blank
2008-08-03 5:08 ` sukadev
2008-08-03 11:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-03 12:04 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-03 17:46 ` sukadev [this message]
2008-08-03 17:54 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080803174646.GA20254@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox