public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jeremy@goop.org, hugh@veritas.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueues
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:03:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804131011.929471978@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080804130317.994042639@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-sched-annotate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4237 bytes --]

Instead of using a per-rq lock class, use the regular nesting operations.

However, take extra care with double_lock_balance() as it can release the
already held rq->lock (and therefore change its nesting class).

So what can happen is:

 spin_lock(rq->lock);	// this rq subclass 0

 double_lock_balance(rq, other_rq);
   // release rq
   // acquire other_rq->lock subclass 0
   // acquire rq->lock subclass 1

 spin_unlock(other_rq->lock);

leaving you with rq->lock in subclass 1

So a subsequent double_lock_balance() call can try to nest a subclass 1
lock while already holding a subclass 1 lock.

Fix this by introducing double_unlock_balance() which releases the other
rq's lock, but also re-sets the subclass for this rq's lock to 0.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/sched.c    |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 kernel/sched_rt.c |    8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -600,7 +600,6 @@ struct rq {
 	/* BKL stats */
 	unsigned int bkl_count;
 #endif
-	struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
@@ -2759,10 +2758,10 @@ static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq
 	} else {
 		if (rq1 < rq2) {
 			spin_lock(&rq1->lock);
-			spin_lock(&rq2->lock);
+			spin_lock_nested(&rq2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 		} else {
 			spin_lock(&rq2->lock);
-			spin_lock(&rq1->lock);
+			spin_lock_nested(&rq1->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 		}
 	}
 	update_rq_clock(rq1);
@@ -2805,14 +2804,21 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq
 		if (busiest < this_rq) {
 			spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
 			spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
-			spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
+			spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 			ret = 1;
 		} else
-			spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
+			spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+	__releases(busiest->lock)
+{
+	spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+	lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
+}
+
 /*
  * If dest_cpu is allowed for this process, migrate the task to it.
  * This is accomplished by forcing the cpu_allowed mask to only
@@ -3637,7 +3643,7 @@ redo:
 		ld_moved = move_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
 					imbalance, sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
 					&all_pinned);
-		spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+		double_unlock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
 
 		if (unlikely(all_pinned)) {
 			cpu_clear(cpu_of(busiest), *cpus);
@@ -3752,7 +3758,7 @@ static void active_load_balance(struct r
 		else
 			schedstat_inc(sd, alb_failed);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&target_rq->lock);
+	double_unlock_balance(busiest_rq, target_rq);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
@@ -8000,7 +8006,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 
 		rq = cpu_rq(i);
 		spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
-		lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key);
 		rq->nr_running = 0;
 		init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs, rq);
 		init_rt_rq(&rq->rt, rq);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -861,6 +861,8 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *
 #define RT_MAX_TRIES 3
 
 static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest);
+static void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest);
+
 static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
 
 static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
@@ -1022,7 +1024,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(st
 			break;
 
 		/* try again */
-		spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock);
+		double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
 		lowest_rq = NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -1091,7 +1093,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
 
 	resched_task(lowest_rq->curr);
 
-	spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock);
+	double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
 
 	ret = 1;
 out:
@@ -1197,7 +1199,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_
 
 		}
  skip:
-		spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock);
+		double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
 	}
 
 	return ret;

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-04 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-04 13:03 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Fix combinatorial explosion in lock subgraph traversal Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05  8:34   ` David Miller
2008-08-05  8:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-13  3:48       ` Tim Pepper
2008-08-13 10:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] lockdep: lock_set_subclass - reset a held locks subclass Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05  8:35   ` David Miller
2008-08-04 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-05  8:35   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueues David Miller
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: shrink held_lock structure Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 16:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-06  7:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] lockdep: map_acquire Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] lockdep: lock protection locks Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:07   ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 14:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:26       ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 14:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:53           ` Dave Jones
2008-08-04 14:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 16:26               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 16:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 17:27                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 17:46                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 17:57                       ` [PATCH] workaround minor lockdep bug triggered by mm_take_all_locks Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 18:48                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 18:56                           ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 19:05                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 20:15                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 20:37                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 21:09                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:14                                 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-04 21:30                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:41                                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-04 22:12                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:42                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-04 22:30                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 23:38                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-05  0:47                                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:27                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-04 21:54                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:57                                 ` David Miller
2008-08-05  2:00                                 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-05  2:18                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-05 12:02                                     ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-05 12:20                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 18:48                     ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 21:32                   ` David Miller
2008-08-04 18:06   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-04 18:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 19:26       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-04 19:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-04 19:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 20:16           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-08 15:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 15:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 16:03               ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 16:19                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 16:53                   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 15:52             ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 17:18               ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-07 11:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 11:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/7] lockdep: annotate mm_take_all_locks() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 11:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/7] mm: fix mm_take_all_locks() locking order Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 12:14   ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-07 12:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 13:27       ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-07 21:46   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-08  1:34     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-08  7:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 10:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080804131011.929471978@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox